Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 5,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Nickelsburg results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 2,706 hits . Analysis detected 21,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,622 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,434 of 6,185 authors). This Monica Nickelsburg is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Monica Nickelsburg
Author details
Total words: 22,622
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst