BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 726 faulty-reasoning hits from 392 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65.1% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,819 of 21,135 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

SCARBOROUGH, Maine (AP)  New protections for endangered right whales in the North Atlantic would be postponed for nearly a decade under a plan that cleared a key hurdle in Washington last week with the full-throated support of the fishing and lobster industries. 
Environmentalists say this could spell the end for the vanishing whales, which can drown after getting tangled up in fishing gear or being struck by boats. 
There are only about 380 North Atlantic right whales left. 
The federal government has already paused any new right whale rules until 2028, and the House Natural Resources Committee voted on July 15 to extend that moratorium to 2035. 
A vote by the Republican-controlled Congress could happen as soon as this summer, and is almost certain to pass. 
President Donald Trump ‘s administration has thrown its support behind U.S. 
Rep. 
Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine, in his efforts to further delay new regulations aimed at protecting right whales. 
Golden introduced the bill along with Republican Rep. 
Mike Lawler of New York. 
“Mainers are not asking for much. 
We just need more time,” he said. 
The moratorium has been in place since 2022. 
Environmental groups warn that amid the delays and further studies, right whales keep dying from run-ins with commercial fishing gear. 
The whale population shrank by about 25% from 2010 to 2020. 
Although they rebounded slightly in recent years, their numbers remain well below 2010, when there were about 480. 
“They needed more protections in 2022 when Congress ignored a mountain of evidence and decided that insufficient efforts were enough,” Gib Brogan, senior campaign director with conservation group Oceana, said. 
“Now, once again, lawmakers are trying to pass the buck.” 
The fishing industry has countered that the current rules are sufficient  and say those rules won’t change if the moratorium is extended. 
“The current conservation framework remains fully in place, and this legislation does not weaken protections for the North Atlantic right whale,” Beth Casoni, executive director of the Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association, said. 
Right whales were once common off the East Coast, but they were hunted to near extinction during the commercial whaling era. 
Aside from entanglement or ship strikes, scientists say the whales are also imperiled by the warming of the ocean due to human-caused climate change. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.7%Patrick Whittle: 1.6%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias20.7%This article: 7.4%Patrick Whittle: 1.5%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias7.4%This article: 22.4%Patrick Whittle: 3.4%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic22.4%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.6%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Patrick Whittle: 1.1%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 4.1%Patrick Whittle: 10.2%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.7%Patrick Whittle: 1.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 1.3%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Patrick Whittle: 0.3%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 19.4%Patrick Whittle: 8.3%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias19.4%This article: 5.9%Patrick Whittle: 2.6%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.5%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 2.2%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Patrick Whittle: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem10.2%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Patrick Whittle: 6.9%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.9%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 1.1%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.8%Patrick Whittle: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 7.7%Patrick Whittle: 8.2%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 1.5%Patrick Whittle: 1.5%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question1.5%This article: 11.0%Patrick Whittle: 1.7%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.0%This article: 5.9%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque5.9%This article: 5.1%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.4%Patrick Whittle: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division5.4%This article: 6.6%Patrick Whittle: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal6.6%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Patrick Whittle: 1.3%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%Patrick Whittle: 0.5%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 1.5%Patrick Whittle: 1.0%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 11.0%Patrick Whittle: 1.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice11.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 1.7%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.8%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Whittle: 0.7%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

392 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers26%attributed speech289writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJared Golden • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJared Golden • 6 words • 100.0% coverageJared Golden • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGib Brogan • 30 words • 0.0% coverageGib Brogan • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBeth Casoni • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gib Brogan

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words39% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.9 ptsWriter: 14.9%Gib Brogan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.