Keyword summary
33% 21 analyzed articles/videos 18,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Endangered Species results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 6,571 hits . Analysis detected 64,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 78,516 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,886 of 34,832 keywords). This Endangered Species is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Endangered Species
Keyword details
Total words: 78,516
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score21 analyzed articles78.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst