Keyword summary
64% 47 analyzed articles/videos 43,877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 11,562 hits . Analysis detected 144,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 211,087 analyzed words across 47 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (35,287 of 36,740 keywords). This Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Conservation
Keyword details
Total words: 211,087
Article count: 47
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score47 analyzed articles211.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst