Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pandora Dewan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 247 hits . Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,009 of 6,299 authors). This Pandora Dewan is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Pandora Dewan
Author details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst