The Blaze⁠80%

Woman caught trying to smuggle live animals through US-Mexico border, CBP claims ⁠33%

By Carlos Garcia⁠63%

7/15/2026, 12:45:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 605 faulty-reasoning hits from 270 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (14,378 of 21,203 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the article peer group.

Customs and Border Protection officials told Blaze News exclusively that a woman has been caught trying to smuggle live birds into the U.S. from Mexico. 
The 26-year-old U.S. citizen was allegedly attempting to walk through the Gateway to the Americas Bridge last Wednesday with the birds in a small container when she was caught. 
'We must remain vigilant in protecting our wildlife from these reckless and illegal activities.' 
CBP officers uncovered the container and identified the birds as parrots. 
The woman was arrested, and the parrots were turned over to the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture - Veterinary Services. 
"These smuggled animals can carry diseases that are not known to occur in the United States, which can endanger native wildlife," said Laredo Port Director Alberto Flores to Blaze News. 
"We must remain vigilant in protecting our wildlife from these reckless and illegal activities," he added. 
"On the border at land, air, and sea-based ports of entry, including Laredo, CBP officers and agriculture specialists continue to fulfill CBP’s agriculture mission by preventing the introduction of harmful pests and diseases into the United States," read a statement from CBP. 
In March, CBP officials were able to detect the smuggling of three live parrots at the same entryway during a secondary inspection of a 2007 GMC Yukon. 
Those parrots were transported to a local zoo to receive care. 
In the March case, CBP released a photo of the birds in a narrow box with holes punched in the cardboard for ventilation. 
Wildlife trafficking convictions can carry significant fines and even jail time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.3%Carlos Garcia: 3.9%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Carlos Garcia: 3.4%Blaze Media: 3.1%Availability Heuristic10.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Carlos Garcia: 11.2%Blaze Media: 9.7%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 4.1%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 15.6%Carlos Garcia: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias15.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Carlos Garcia: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias15.9%This article: 30.7%Carlos Garcia: 11.4%Blaze Media: 9.5%Negativity Bias30.7%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.7%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.2%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.9%Blaze Media: 2.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Carlos Garcia: 1.7%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect15.6%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias10.0%This article: 8.5%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 3.2%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.3%Carlos Garcia: 3.7%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority29.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.4%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.1%Carlos Garcia: 5.2%Blaze Media: 9.0%Hasty Generalization11.1%This article: 8.5%Carlos Garcia: 1.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring8.5%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.2%Carlos Garcia: 10.1%Blaze Media: 8.1%Appeal to Emotion22.2%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal10.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Carlos Garcia: 3.6%Blaze Media: 2.7%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 4.4%Carlos Garcia: 3.8%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 9.3%Carlos Garcia: 5.7%Blaze Media: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice9.3%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 2.4%Blaze Media: 4.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 0.9%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 5.8%Blaze Media: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carlos Garcia: 3.7%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

270 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers67%attributed speech90writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageCustoms and Border Protection • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageCustoms and Border Protection • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Agriculture • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAlberto Flores • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAlberto Flores • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCustoms and Border Protection • 42 words • 0.0% coverageCustoms and Border Protection • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCustoms and Border Protection • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alberto Flores

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words26% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-15.6 ptsWriter: 15.6%Alberto Flores: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Alberto Flores: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.