Topic summary
⁠73%3 analyzed articles/videos270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Customs And Border Protection results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 5,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,701 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,813 of 16,562 topics). This Customs And Border Protection is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Customs And Border Protection
Topic details
Total words: 4,701
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos