Keyword summary
15%2 analyzed articles/videos521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Mexico Border results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (15,906 of 35,854 keywords). This US Mexico Border is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
US Mexico Border
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
56%US Mexico Border (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,833
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos