Keyword summary
81% 29 analyzed articles/videos 26,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alabama results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 11,100 hits . Analysis detected 90,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 97,262 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,092 of 35,713 keywords). This Alabama is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Alabama
Keyword details
Total words: 97,262
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score29 analyzed articles97.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst