Futurism88%

You'll Never Guess Why Government Officials Are Sinking a Four-Story Riverboat Casino Into the Abyss 29%

By Joe Wilkins84%

7/5/2026, 7:02:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.4% saturation with 188 hits. Analysis detected 1,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 490 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,563 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the article peer group.

Government officials in Alabama are giving an old riverboat casino a from Indiana a new life  not floating down the state’s copious waterways, but at the bottom of the sea. 
Alabama-based news channel WPMI detailed the unusual plan to scuttle the riverboat, called the Argosy VI, off the coast of Orange Beach, a small city roughly an hour south east of Mobile. 
According to the outlet, the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources purchased the Argosy VI with plans to turn it into an artificial reef. 
Earlier this week, teams of workers gutted the interior of the vessel, clearing slot machines and other gambling fixtures to make room for future residents: mussels, barnacles, sponges, and corals. 
"You'll start seeing fish on it within a few weeks, but for it to become a highly productive reef structure its going to take a couple years before all the tuna kits, the bryozoa, the corals before they start really settling on it and providing the base of the food web that's going to feed the larger predatory fishes," Craig Newton, supervisor of the Alabama Marine Resources Fisheries Section told WPMI. 
Completed in 1997 for the price of $6.5 million, the Argosy VI is a flat-bottomed, four-floored passenger vessel spanning nearly 400 feet in length  an impressive footprint for a boat that spent half its life in Lawrenceburg, Indiana. 
According to the Cincinnati Enquirer, the Argosy VI had a maximum capacity of 4,407 people, with room for over 1,700 slot machines, a number rivaling midsized land-based casinos. 
Once considered the world’s largest riverboat casino, the Argosy VI is now taking its place as part of the world’s largest artificial reef system. 
Begun in 1953 with the sinking of 250 junk cars, Alabama's world-leading artificial reef system comprises some 1,060 square miles of coastal water. 
Over the years, state officials have purposefully scuttled untold numbers of barges, ships, oil and gas platforms, bridges, docks, culverts, and even army tanks to create habitats for coastal critters. 
Because the Alabama sea floor is mostly a slurry of dirt and detritus, conservation officials say the artificial reef elements provide a sturdy habitat for corals and marine invertebrates to call home. 
This in turn creates a thriving ecosystem that can support larger fish life, like red snappers, sheepshead seabream, and triggerfish. 
In addition to improving marine diversity, the artificial reef has a knock-on effect of attracting tourists to the region. 
"Alabama is very limited in the amount of hard bottom or coral areas here in this part of the Gulf of Mexico," Kevin Anson, director of the Alabama DCNR's marine resources division told WPMI." 
A lot of the reef fish species that many people like to target while they're fishing require reef structure at least for some segment of their life history." 
More on oceans: Scientists Horrified by Record-Breaking Ocean Temperatures 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 6.8%Futurism: 6.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 18.4%Joe Wilkins: 1.7%Futurism: 1.6%Anchoring Bias18.4%This article: 19.2%Joe Wilkins: 6.5%Futurism: 6.2%Availability Heuristic19.2%This article: 5.7%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.3%Futurism: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 3.9%Futurism: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Joe Wilkins: 13.2%Futurism: 11.3%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.1%Futurism: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.1%Joe Wilkins: 0.7%Futurism: 0.7%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.9%Futurism: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 4.7%Futurism: 4.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Joe Wilkins: 25.8%Futurism: 22.5%Negativity Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error6.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Joe Wilkins: 1.2%Futurism: 0.6%In-Group Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.5%Futurism: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Joe Wilkins: 1.3%Futurism: 1.1%Halo Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.6%Futurism: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Joe Wilkins: 2.3%Futurism: 2.1%Recency Bias1.8%This article: 4.7%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.6%Futurism: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.0%Futurism: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 38.4%Joe Wilkins: 5.8%Futurism: 6.8%Appeal to Authority38.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 2.6%Futurism: 2.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 2.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.3%Futurism: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Joe Wilkins: 12.7%Futurism: 10.5%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 1.8%Joe Wilkins: 1.1%Futurism: 1.0%Red Herring1.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.9%Joe Wilkins: 11.5%Futurism: 9.5%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.7%Futurism: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.0%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.1%Futurism: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.3%Futurism: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 6.1%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.4%Appeal to Nature6.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 4.3%Futurism: 4.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.0%Futurism: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.9%Joe Wilkins: 2.3%Futurism: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.0%Futurism: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.2%Futurism: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.6%Futurism: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.4%Joe Wilkins: 3.4%Futurism: 3.9%Unattributed Quote21.4%This article: 10.0%Joe Wilkins: 3.0%Futurism: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection10.0%This article: 28.8%Joe Wilkins: 26.8%Futurism: 20.7%Biased Writer Voice28.8%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.8%Futurism: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 5.0%Futurism: 2.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 0.4%Futurism: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Wilkins: 1.5%Futurism: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

490 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers45%attributed speech268writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWPMI • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAlabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Newton • 71 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageCincinnati Enquirer • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageconservation officials • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Anson • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kevin Anson

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words15% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kevin Anson: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+94.4 ptsWriter: 5.6%Kevin Anson: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-52.6 ptsWriter: 52.6%Kevin Anson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.