Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Reefs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 1,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,772 of 16,562 topics). This Artificial Reefs is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Artificial Reefs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.4%16.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos