Author summary
36% 1 analyzed article/video 369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Lynch Baldwin results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Status Quo Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 173 hits . Analysis detected 730 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,107 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,235 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Lynch Baldwin is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Sarah Lynch Baldwin
Author details
Total words: 1,107
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.4% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.6% 15.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst