Topic summary
80% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Crimes results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 5,700 hits . Analysis detected 44,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,989 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,507 of 15,492 topics). This War Crimes is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. War Crimes
Topic details
Total words: 37,989
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score12 analyzed articles38K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst