Topic summary
⁠80%5 analyzed articles/videos3,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volunteerism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,190 hits. Analysis detected 14,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,272 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,669 of 16,562 topics). This Volunteerism is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Volunteerism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,272
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos