Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ian McCluskey results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Sunk Cost Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 407 hits. Analysis detected 2,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,714 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Ian McCluskey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ian McCluskey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Ian McCluskey (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,714
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 23.8%23.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.5%12.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos