Topic summary
71% 13 analyzed articles/videos 2,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vandalism results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,609 hits . Analysis detected 26,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,910 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,386 of 15,781 topics). This Vandalism is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Vandalism
Topic details
Total words: 21,910
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst