BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 751 faulty-reasoning hits from 534 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,791 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the article peer group.

A former Team USA Olympian has been arrested for allegedly vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after the completion of President Donald Trump’s renovation. 
David Hearn, 67, was arrested on a misdemeanor charge of destruction of government property on Friday in Washington, D.C. 
The three-time Olympic canoeist was cycling near the monument when he said he stopped and noticed a piece of the pool’s new liner floating in the water. 
He told The Washington Post that he reached out and touched the piece before Park Police took him into custody. 
“I didn’t vandalize anything,” Hearn said. 
“I didn’t destroy or break or peel anything. 
By the time I realized what was going on, I was being put in handcuffs.” 
The cyclist also denied touching the hose used by government workers, but acknowledged his bike might have. 
Trump had been renovating the reflecting pool, which he called “filthy dirty,” for weeks. 
A former real estate developer, he determined to seal the bottom with a compound used for swimming pools and paint it “American Flag Blue,” rather than remove all the stones at the bottom for an expensive and lengthy overhaul. 
Since the president revealed the new blue pool, workers have often been spotted trying to remove persistent green algae from its water. 
In a Truth Social Post on Friday, Trump acknowledged the hurdles facing the restoration efforts for the pool, which is part of a broader initiative by his administration to clean up and beautify the capital. 
He also said that the monument had been vandalized in the days after it was completed. 
“We’ve cleaned, renovated, and beautified over 45 Monuments and Memorials, 28 Statues, and 22 Fountains in Washington, D.C. 
Things are really looking good in our Nation’s Capital, and add to that the fact that when I became President, Crime was rampant, and now, Washington, D.C., is one of the Safest Cities anywhere in the United States,” the president wrote. 
“However, we’ve had some real problems with Vandalism at the beautiful Reflecting Pool, which sits between The Washington Monument and The Lincoln Memorial,” he continued. 
“Just like three days ago, they destroyed the grass outside of the Pool, they’ve also done everything possible to hurt the inside surface that was just installed. 
No different than the chemicals that were used on the National Mall, they used something similar in the Reflecting Pool to try to destroy and demean our beautiful work.” 
Trump referenced the recent vandalism of the National Mall, which was inscribed with the numbers “8647.” 
The message is viewed as a code for eliminating President Trump  “86” meaning to get rid of or cancel something, and Trump being the 47th president. 
“The algae is 75% gone, and the condition will soon be completely remedied, and the area that was vandalized, fortunately, is just a small area of damage, and will be fixed early next week,” he affirmed. 
“It’s a shame that the Radical Left Lunatics, most likely Dumocats, who have spent their lives trying to ruin our Country, are free to do so. 
Law Enforcement is actively investigating this situation, and will hopefully have it resolved soon.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.8%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.3%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 9.7%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect7.3%This article: 21.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.4%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias21.0%This article: 2.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 12.7%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 6.5%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias12.7%This article: 2.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.8%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.8%This article: 4.9%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 6.5%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias8.1%This article: 7.7%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.9%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.4%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem4.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 5.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization10.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.9%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 11.2%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.8%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.6%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.5%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.1%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 6.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice2.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 7.1%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Katherine Mosack: 2.2%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

534 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers59%attributed speech218writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Hearn • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Hearn • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Hearn • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Hearn • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 35 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 41 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 36 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 26 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

94%flagged-word coverage
267 attributed words84% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Politically Right Leaning +9.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer Voice-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.