Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos2,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hearn results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 982 hits. Analysis detected 10,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,988 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,753 of 37,533 keywords). This David Hearn is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
David Hearn

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate