Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hearn results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 982 hits . Analysis detected 10,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,988 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,753 of 37,533 keywords). This David Hearn is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. David Hearn
Keyword details
Total words: 10,988
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst