Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lincoln Memorial results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 4,957 hits . Analysis detected 30,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,204 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,013 of 15,535 topics). This Lincoln Memorial is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Lincoln Memorial
Topic details
Total words: 21,204
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst