Keyword summary
30%5 analyzed articles/videos2,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 655 hits. Analysis detected 9,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,392 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (32,493 of 35,701 keywords). This Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
9%Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate