Author summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeline Taub results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 3,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,894 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,032 of 6,275 authors). This Madeline Taub is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Madeline Taub
Author details
Total words: 3,894
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst