Topic summary
74% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccines results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 4,016 hits . Analysis detected 32,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,109 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,419 of 15,447 topics). This Vaccines is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Vaccines
Topic details
Total words: 35,109
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles35.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst