Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These LAURAN NEERGAARD results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 603 hits . Analysis detected 3,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,497 authors). This LAURAN NEERGAARD is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. LAURAN NEERGAARD
Author details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.2% 19.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.3% 5.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst