Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos7,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandy Zadrozny results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 3,997 hits. Analysis detected 30,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,746 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (4,641 of 6,362 authors). This Brandy Zadrozny is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Brandy Zadrozny
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠28%Brandy Zadrozny (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,746
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles29.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.3%9.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos