Topic summary
⁠90%4 analyzed articles/videos3,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaccine Policy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 2,793 hits. Analysis detected 17,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,417 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (8,777 of 15,585 topics). This Vaccine Policy is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Vaccine Policy

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos