Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Melissa Fleur Afshar results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 4,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,196 authors). This Melissa Fleur Afshar is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Melissa Fleur Afshar
Author details
Total words: 2,946
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 14.9% 14.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.6% 15.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst