Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Godoy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 3,673 hits . Analysis detected 23,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,725 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,289 of 6,196 authors). This Maria Godoy is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Maria Godoy
Author details
Total words: 20,725
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.7% 17.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst