Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos5,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Godoy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 3,673 hits. Analysis detected 23,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,725 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,289 of 6,196 authors). This Maria Godoy is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Maria Godoy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Maria Godoy (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,725
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 17.7%17.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 17.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate