Topic summary
79% 27 analyzed articles/videos 20,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Elections results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 15,918 hits . Analysis detected 125,193 faulty-reasoning hits from 88,634 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,312 of 16,408 topics). This Us Elections is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Us Elections
Topic details
Total words: 88,634
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score26 analyzed articles88.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst