Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Micah McCartney results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 262 hits . Analysis detected 3,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,009 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,171 authors). This Micah McCartney is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Micah McCartney
Author details
Total words: 3,009
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.4% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Tu Quoque: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst