Author summary
25%2 analyzed articles/videos584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Jacobs results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 2,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,906 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,277 of 6,171 authors). This Jennifer Jacobs is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Jennifer Jacobs
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Jennifer Jacobs (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,906
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate