Author summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liza Featherstone results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 2,215 hits . Analysis detected 16,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,275 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,281 of 6,171 authors). This Liza Featherstone is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Liza Featherstone
Author details
Total words: 8,275
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.3% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 26.8% 26.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.6% 26.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 26.8%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst