Topic summary
59% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Union Negotiations results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 2,479 hits . Analysis detected 16,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,155 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,257 of 16,562 topics). This Union Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Union Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 20,155
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst