Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison Lammert results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,707 hits . Analysis detected 12,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,336 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,247 of 6,498 authors). This Madison Lammert is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Madison Lammert
Author details
Total words: 9,336
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.4% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.3% 18.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.8% 7.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.4% 5.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst