Topic summary
69% 12 analyzed articles/videos 16,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Economy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 5,151 hits . Analysis detected 55,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,633 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,171 of 15,361 topics). This U S Economy is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. U S Economy
Topic details
Total words: 69,633
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score12 analyzed articles69.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst