Author summary
34%1 analyzed article/video331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Nevo results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,403 of 6,202 authors). This Lily Nevo is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Lily Nevo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
78%Lily Nevo (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,324
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510077.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 11.4%11.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos