Author summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Nevo results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 155 hits . Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,403 of 6,202 authors). This Lily Nevo is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Lily Nevo
Author details
Total words: 1,324
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.4% 11.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst