Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jack A. Smalligan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 554 hits. Analysis detected 4,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,235 authors). This Jack A. Smalligan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jack A. Smalligan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Jack A. Smalligan (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,811
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos