Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William H. Frey results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 722 hits. Analysis detected 5,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (3,408 of 6,461 authors). This William H. Frey is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
William H. Frey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠48%William H. Frey (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,512
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.1%11.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos