Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shriya Methkupally results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 5,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,812 of 6,364 authors). This Shriya Methkupally is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Shriya Methkupally
Author details
Total words: 12,460
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst