Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Aley results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 762 hits . Analysis detected 5,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,468 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,904 of 6,601 authors). This Adam Aley is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Adam Aley
Author details
Total words: 6,468
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst