Topic summary
76% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spacex results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 4,239 hits . Analysis detected 35,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,685 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,872 of 15,608 topics). This Spacex is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Spacex
Topic details
Total words: 34,685
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score17 analyzed articles34.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst