TechCrunch47%
SpaceX suddenly aborts second Starship V3 launch after ignition 37%
By Sean O'Kane21%
7/16/2026, 11:01:27 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 307 faulty-reasoning hits from 519 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.7% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,780 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the article peer group.
SpaceX abruptly aborted the second attempted launch of its upgraded Starship rocket system on Thursday, just moments after the booster ignited at the company’s complex in South Texas.
CEO Elon Musk said on his social media platform X that “[s]ome of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort” and that the company will replace two of them.
SpaceX won’t try to launch Starship again until next week, he wrote.
SpaceX was hoping to launch its first third-generation Starlink satellites into space — although they are supposed to burn up around 20 minutes after deployment, as Starship has not yet demonstrated the ability to reach Earth orbit.
This is also SpaceX's first Starship test launch attempt since it went public on June 12 in the largest IPO in history.
The company raised more than $85 billion in the transaction and briefly touched the valuations of Amazon and Microsoft, though its stock has steadily fallen over the intervening month.
On Thursday, SpaceX's stock price closed below its IPO price of $135.
Its stock sank more than 4% in after-hours trading after the aborted launch.
SpaceX was trying to return to flight just a few weeks after the first-ever launch of Starship V3 in May.
That mission was a mixed bag.
Getting off the launchpad with the first version of a newly upgraded rocket was a big step forward, and the company was able to deploy a number of Starlink simulators into space.
But the Super Heavy booster stage suffered a failure before it could attempt a simulated landing in the Gulf of Mexico, leading to an FAA-ordered review of what went wrong.
(The FAA cleared the company to fly Starship again earlier this week after identifying a number of causes and fixes for the booster failure.)
Starship's upper stage also lost an engine on its way to deploying the Starlink simulators during the May mission.
The upper stage was able to perform its own simulated landing over the water without a hitch.
SpaceX was hoping to take another step forward Thursday by launching the V3 Starlink satellites.
The upgraded Starship and Starlink are key to SpaceX's incredibly ambitious plans to prove that the concept of “orbital data centers” is both technologically and economically viable.
Starlink is also the largest revenue generator and the only profitable portion of SpaceX's business.
Thursday's launch attempt looked to be chugging along just fine, with only a brief hold in the countdown at T-minus one minute before the scheduled launch attempt.
That hold cleared quickly, and the countdown resumed.
As the countdown expired, the launchpad's water deluge system fired up, and the booster stage visibly began firing its engines — only for everything to suddenly shut down.
Graphics on SpaceX's broadcast appeared to show that four of the company's new Raptor engines did not fire upon ignition.
SpaceX now has to take all the propellant out of both the Super Heavy booster and the upper stage, before determining exactly what went wrong on Thursday.
<em>This story has been updated with new information from Elon Musk.</em>
Speakers
1speaker8.3%attributed speech476writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
0%flagged-word coverageElon Musk
43 attributed words100% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.