Topic summary
83% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smart Home results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 4,887 hits . Analysis detected 26,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,813 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,484 of 16,562 topics). This Smart Home is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Smart Home
Topic details
Total words: 18,813
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 26.0% 26.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst