Author summary
23% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aisha Malik results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,261 hits . Analysis detected 6,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,866 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,047 of 6,496 authors). This Aisha Malik is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Aisha Malik
Author details
Total words: 8,866
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst