Author summary
25%4 analyzed articles/videos974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Akshay Gangwar results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 3,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,474 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,073 of 6,382 authors). This Akshay Gangwar is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Akshay Gangwar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Akshay Gangwar (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,474
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.4%9.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate