Publication summary
64% 75 analyzed articles/videos 37,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Android Authority results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 21,144 hits . Analysis detected 181,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 169,560 analyzed words across 75 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (175 of 400 publications). This Android Authority is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 169,560
Article count: 75
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score75 analyzed articles169.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 12.5% 12.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst