Author summary
32%6 analyzed articles/videos3,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aamir Siddiqui results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,073 hits. Analysis detected 10,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,799 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,391 of 6,382 authors). This Aamir Siddiqui is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Aamir Siddiqui
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Aamir Siddiqui (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,799
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate