Author summary
32% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aamir Siddiqui results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,073 hits . Analysis detected 10,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,799 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,391 of 6,382 authors). This Aamir Siddiqui is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Aamir Siddiqui
Author details
Total words: 12,799
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst