Topic summary
26% 8 analyzed articles/videos 8,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sleep results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 3,165 hits . Analysis detected 26,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,850 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,564 of 16,233 topics). This Sleep is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. Sleep
Topic details
Total words: 44,850
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles44.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst