Author summary
31%7 analyzed articles/videos4,957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Skwarecki results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,842 hits. Analysis detected 18,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,972 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,364 of 6,315 authors). This Beth Skwarecki is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Beth Skwarecki
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
16%Beth Skwarecki (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 25,972
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles26K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate