Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Becca Warner results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Nature , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 746 hits . Analysis detected 5,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,629 of 6,628 authors). This Becca Warner is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Becca Warner
Author details
Total words: 6,800
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.3% 10.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst