Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos4,976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sexual Misconduct results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,729 hits. Analysis detected 23,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,458 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,160 of 16,562 topics). This Sexual Misconduct is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate